United States v. Noushfar

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Noushfar

140 F.3d 1244, 1998 WL 146418

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 1998

DocketNos. 94-30229, 94-30350 and 94-30353

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 140 F.3d 1244 (United States v. Noushfar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Noushfar, 140 F.3d 1244, 1998 WL 146418 (9th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows:

The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with “In Riley v. Deeds. ...,” is replaced to read:

In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir.1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the [1245]*1245judge present and with his clerk “presiding.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows:

The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with “In Riley v. Deeds. ...,” is replaced to read:

In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir.1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the [1245]*1245judge present and with his clerk “presiding.”

144 F.3d 1249 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

United States v. Klimavicius-Viloria

144 F.3d 1249 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Autar E. Nauton v. Anthony Newland, Respondent-Appelee

142 F.3d 444 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 F.3d 1244, 1998 WL 146418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-noushfar-ca9-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack