United States v. Noushfar
140 F.3d 1244, 1998 WL 146418
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 1, 1998·No. Nos. 94-30229, 94-30350 and 94-30353·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows:
The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with “In Riley v. Deeds. ...,” is replaced to read:
In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir.1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the [1245] judge present and with his clerk “presiding.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Noushfar, 140 F.3d 1244, 1998 WL 146418 (9th Cir. 1998).
140 F.3d 1244 (United States v. Noushfar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Erik Maund
Sixth Circuit, 2026
State v. Centeno
2023 UT 22 (Utah Supreme Court, 2023)
State v. Sullivan
414 P.3d 737 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2018)
United States v. Anthony Chadwell
798 F.3d 910 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Mohamud
941 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (D. Oregon, 2013)
People v. Gamache
227 P.3d 342 (California Supreme Court, 2010)
United States v. Mitchell
337 F. App'x 650 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Sappa
178 F. App'x 724 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Arlt
15 F. App'x 431 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,982, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8565 United States of America v. James Bowden Beard, United States of America v. James Bowden Beard
161 F.3d 1190 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Beard
161 F.3d 1190 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Klimavicius-Viloria
144 F.3d 1249 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Autar E. Nauton v. Anthony Newland, Respondent-Appelee
142 F.3d 444 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)