United States v. Northern Metal Co.

227 F. Supp. 396, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7884
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 22, 1963
DocketNo. 197 of 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 227 F. Supp. 396 (United States v. Northern Metal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Northern Metal Co., 227 F. Supp. 396, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7884 (E.D. Pa. 1963).

Opinion

BODY, District Judge.

On May 1, 1959 one Albert Mascuilli, a longshoreman employed by respondent, was injured and as a result subsequently died. His estate brought suit on June 4, 1959 against the United States of America alleging that the vessel, USNS MARINE FIDDLER, was liable.

On March 11, 1963 libellant filed the instant action which is based on the theory that respondent is legally obligated to indemnify the United States.

There is no doubt that the right to indemnification may arise, and often does, in eases of injury arising out of the unloading of vessels. However, it is well settled in this District that such an action is premature when trial is pending in the original action against the vessel. West Africa Navigation, Ltd. v. Nacirema Operating Co., 191 F.Supp. 131 (E.D.Pa.1961). It is to be noted that neglect in the failure to seek timely joinder of the stevedore created the problem in that case, as it seems to have done here. Also see Mitsui Steamship Co., Ltd. v. Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia, 218 F.Supp. 424 (E.D.Pa.1963).

The cases cited by libellant involve suits where settlement was effectuated in the original action brought by the injured party. They are not persuasive on the issue before us.

The remainder of the libellant’s contentions are without merit.

ORDER

And now, this twenty-second day of November, 1963, after consideration of oral argument and the briefs of counsel, it is ordered that respondent Northern Metal Company’s Exceptions to the Libel of the United States of America be and the same are hereby sustained and the Libel is dismissed without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West Africa Navigation, Ltd. v. Nacirema Operating Co.
191 F. Supp. 131 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1961)
Mitsui Steamship Co. v. Jarka Corp. of Philadelphia
218 F. Supp. 424 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 F. Supp. 396, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-northern-metal-co-paed-1963.