United States v. Norman Lee Pledger

301 F.2d 906, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5437
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 9, 1962·No. 8519_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was here once before on Pledger’s appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing without a hearing his petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. We remanded for a hearing. Pledger v. United States, 272 F.2d 69 (4th Cir. 1959). The sole issue presented at the hearing was whether the defendant was mentally competent at the time of his trial and conviction. On this issue the District Court heard testimony including that of the attorney who had been employed by the defendant himself and who defended him at the trial. The District Court concluded upon the testimony that the defendant was in fact competent to stand trial and to cooperate with his counsel. This conclusion is well supported in the evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Norman Lee Pledger, 301 F.2d 906, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5437 (4th Cir. 1962).

301 F.2d 906 (United States v. Norman Lee Pledger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deese v. United States
303 F. Supp. 619 (D. South Carolina, 1969)
United States v. Leroy Kendrick
331 F.2d 110 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)
Sturrup v. United States
218 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. North Carolina, 1963)
James Peter Taylor v. United States Oa America
308 F.2d 776 (Eighth Circuit, 1962)