United States v. Norman Heinz Melendy

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Norman Heinz Melendy

438 F.2d 531, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11522

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1971

Docket26005_1

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 438 F.2d 531 (United States v. Norman Heinz Melendy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Norman Heinz Melendy, 438 F.2d 531, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11522 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction for a threat on the life of the President of *532 the United States is affirmed. 18 U.S.C. § 871.

The defendant, incarcerated at Lompoc, California, did not have much capacity to carry out his threat, but the threat is the crime.

The defense was that defendant did not have the requisite intent for the crime. That was a question of fact which he lost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction for a threat on the life of the President of *532 the United States is affirmed. 18 U.S.C. § 871.

The defendant, incarcerated at Lompoc, California, did not have much capacity to carry out his threat, but the threat is the crime.

The defense was that defendant did not have the requisite intent for the crime. That was a question of fact which he lost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 F.2d 531, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-norman-heinz-melendy-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack