United States v. Norman Elliot McElroy
This text of 42 F.3d 1407 (United States v. Norman Elliot McElroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
42 F.3d 1407
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Norman Elliot McELROY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-8126.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 26, 1994.
We affirm McElroy's sentence. McElroy's arguments on appeal are precluded by his plea of guilty to an Information charging production of 80 to 99 plants and the district court's discretion to refuse a downward departure based on mental condition.
AFFIRMED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470
The Honorable Thomas M. Reavley,
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 F.3d 1407, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39210, 1994 WL 593876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-norman-elliot-mcelroy-ca10-1994.