United States v. Norman E. Van Zee

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3640

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota.

Norman Eugene Van Zee, *

*

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 11, 2004

Filed: August 17, 2004 (corrected 8/18/04)

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BRIGHT and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

LOKEN, Chief Judge.

After the district court1 denied his motion to suppress following an evidentiary hearing, Norman Eugene Van Zee entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Van Zee now appeals, arguing that the district court should have suppressed evidence seized during a warrantless search of his vehicle and additional

1 The HONORABLE LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the HONORABLE JOHN E. SIMKO, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.