United States v. Norma Jean Johnson Narisi

538 F.2d 1213, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7050
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 20, 1976·No. 76-2448·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court has failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 11(c), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, by not personally informing appellant of the constitutionally protected rights which she would be waiving if her guilty plea was accepted, and by not ascertaining that appellant understood those rights and voluntarily waived them. McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S.Ct. 1166, 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); United States v. Crook, 5 Cir. 1976, 526 F.2d 708; Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).

Mrs. Narisi’s conviction is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Norma Jean Johnson Narisi, 538 F.2d 1213, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7050 (5th Cir. 1976).

538 F.2d 1213 (United States v. Norma Jean Johnson Narisi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robert Earl Aldridge
553 F.2d 922 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)