United States v. Norfus

709 F. App'x 682
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 26, 2018·No. No. 17-12019 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330, 1334 (11th Cir. 2005) (“Plea bargains ... are like contracts and should be interpreted in accord with what the parties intended.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Norfus, 709 F. App'x 682 (11th Cir. 2018).

709 F. App'x 682 (United States v. Norfus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Angela Ann Rubbo
396 F.3d 1330 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Bennie Bascomb, Jr.
451 F.3d 1292 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)