United States v. Norfus
This text of 709 F. App'x 682 (United States v. Norfus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BY THE COURT:
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330, 1334 (11th Cir. 2005) (“Plea bargains ... are like contracts and should be interpreted in accord with what the parties intended.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-norfus-ca11-2018.