United States v. Norberto Reveles-Espinoza
This text of United States v. Norberto Reveles-Espinoza (United States v. Norberto Reveles-Espinoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-50905 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00040-NAJ NORBERTO REVELES-ESPINOZA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND WITHDRAWING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION
Filed April 15, 2008
Before: Raymond C. Fisher and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Raner C. Collins, District Judge.*
ORDER
Appellant’s petition for rehearing, filed November 2, 2007, is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on Octo- ber 19, 2007, and appearing at 251 Fed. Appx. 455 (9th Cir. 2007) is withdrawn. The superseding per curiam opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. The parties may file an additional petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. All other pending motions are denied as moot.
*The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
3969 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Norberto Reveles-Espinoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-norberto-reveles-espinoza-ca9-2008.