United States v. Norbert

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Norbert. Read the opinion of the Court — 990 F.3d 968
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2022·No. 20-60106·Published

Opinion

Case: 20-60106 Document: 00516192660 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/04/2022

REVISED

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED February 4, 2022 No. 20-60106 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Okanlawan O. Norbert,

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:19-cr-50

Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Davis, Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED by an equally divided court. Our “judgment [is] not entitled to precedential weight no matter what reasoning may have supported it.” Rutledge v. United States, 517 U.S. 292, 304 (1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Norbert, (5th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Norbert (United States v. Norbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rutledge v. United States
517 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1996)