United States v. Noe Juarez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Noe Juarez. Read the opinion of the Court — 866 F.3d 622
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2019·No. 18-30574·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-30574 Document: 00514869721 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 18-30574 March 12, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOE JUAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:11-CR-95-4

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Noe Juarez raises arguments that under the law of the case doctrine are foreclosed. See United States v. Agofsky, 516 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir. 2008). Juarez’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Noe Juarez, (5th Cir. 2019).

United States v. Noe Juarez (United States v. Noe Juarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Agofsky
516 F.3d 280 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)