United States v. Nobriga
This text of United States v. Nobriga (United States v. Nobriga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-10169 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00209-HG District of Hawaii, FRED NOBRIGA, Defendant-Appellant. Honolulu
ORDER
Filed January 3, 2006
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and James M. Fitzgerald,* District Judge.
ORDER
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. The opinion filed May 20, 2005, and reported at 408 F.3d 1178, is withdrawn. That opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.
Submission of this case is withdrawn and resubmission of the case is deferred pending issuance of the opinion of the en banc court in Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, No. 03-74533.
*The Honorable James M. Fitzgerald, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
1 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Nobriga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nobriga-ca9-2006.