United States v. Noble

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Noble. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 F. App'x 669
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2001·No. 01-40116·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40116 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JASON GREGORY NOBLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-93-ALL -------------------- June 29, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jason Noble appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea

conviction for making a false statement when obtaining a firearm.

He argues that the two guns he pawned and was attempting to

retrieve were solely for hunting purposes and that the district

court should have reduced Noble’s offense level by six levels in

accordance with U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2).

We review the district court’s finding whether the firearms

were possessed solely for legitimate sporting or collection

purposes for clear error. See United States v. Shell, 972 F.2d

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40116 -2-

548, 550, 553 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court’s finding that

the firearms were not solely for hunting, as alleged by Noble,

was sufficiently supported by the presentence report and the

record. The district court’s refusal to grant an offense level

adjustment based upon U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2) was not clear error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Noble, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Noble (United States v. Noble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.