United States v. Nna

564 F. App'x 478
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 29, 2014·No. No. 13-12196·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul D. Brown, appointed counsel for Rodney Eugene Hill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). J. Clark Stankowski, appointed counsel for Florence Chigozie Nna in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Hills’s and Nna’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nna, 564 F. App'x 478 (11th Cir. 2014).

564 F. App'x 478 (United States v. Nna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)