United States v. Nix

21 C.M.A. 76, 21 USCMA 76, 44 C.M.R. 130, 1971 CMA LEXIS 556, 1971 WL 12467
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided October 22, 1971·No. No. 24,532·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Chief Judge:

If an accused indicates after a court is called to order that he desires a military judge alone to try him, the court-martial must be recessed and the request executed in writing. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

In this case, however, the written request followed the testimony of one witness. This procedure does not comply with the holding in Dean, supra, since acceptance of the written request is a jurisdictional prerequisite. Under Dean we do not test for prejudice.

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed and the findings and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. Another trial may be ordered.

Senior Judge Ferguson concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nix, 21 C.M.A. 76, 21 USCMA 76, 44 C.M.R. 130, 1971 CMA LEXIS 556, 1971 WL 12467 (cma 1971).

21 C.M.A. 76 (United States v. Nix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jungbluth
48 M.J. 951 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1998)
United States v. Mayfield
43 M.J. 766 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1995)
United States v. Smith
41 M.J. 817 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1995)
United States v. Hussey
1 M.J. 804 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Morris
23 C.M.A. 319 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1975)
United States v. White
21 C.M.A. 583 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
United States v. Brown
21 C.M.A. 516 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)