United States v. Nittayanupap

884 F.2d 1318, 1989 WL 106281
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 1989
DocketNos. 87-1395, 88-1001
StatusPublished

This text of 884 F.2d 1318 (United States v. Nittayanupap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nittayanupap, 884 F.2d 1318, 1989 WL 106281 (9th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

On June 19,1989, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 3181, 105 L.Ed.2d 690 the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment of this court and remanded this case for further consideration in light of Gomez v. United States, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 2237, 104 L.Ed.2d 923 (1989). In Gomez, the court held that it is reversible error for federal magistrates to conduct jury selection in felony trials without defendant’s consent. This court recently held that the per se rule of reversal announced in Gomez, applies to all cases pending on direct review and not final when Gomez was decided. United States v. France, 886 F.2d 223 (9th Cir.1989). This case is indistinguishable from France. Therefore, the judgment in this case is reversed.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gomez v. United States
490 U.S. 858 (Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Darlina K. France
886 F.2d 223 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 F.2d 1318, 1989 WL 106281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nittayanupap-ca9-1989.