United States v. Nino

688 F. App'x 712
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 15, 2017·No. No. 16-15230 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

All Kamalzadeh, appointed counsel for Fernando Nino in this appeal of the denial of Nino’s motion to reduce his sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assess[713] ment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Nino’s motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nino, 688 F. App'x 712 (11th Cir. 2017).

688 F. App'x 712 (United States v. Nino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)