United States v. Niezek

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Niezek

489 F.2d 703, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10061

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 1974

DocketNo. 73-2729

StatusPublished

This text of 489 F.2d 703 (United States v. Niezek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Niezek, 489 F.2d 703, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10061 (5th Cir. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Niezek appeals from his conviction on a two-count indictment for violations of Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 1955 and 2, and Title 18, U.S.C., Section 371. The evidence was submitted on a written stipulation before the District Court, the appellant having waived his trial by jury. After a careful review of the record, we find no merit in Niezek’s contentions that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction on either count, and we affirm as to both counts.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Niezek appeals from his conviction on a two-count indictment for violations of Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 1955 and 2, and Title 18, U.S.C., Section 371. The evidence was submitted on a written stipulation before the District Court, the appellant having waived his trial by jury. After a careful review of the record, we find no merit in Niezek’s contentions that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction on either count, and we affirm as to both counts.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 F.2d 703, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-niezek-ca5-1974.