United States v. Nicole Schilling
This text of United States v. Nicole Schilling (United States v. Nicole Schilling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 16-41023 Document: 00513883101 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-41023 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED February 21, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
NICOLE MARIE SCHILLING,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16-CR-260-1
Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Nicole Marie Schilling raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Nicole Schilling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nicole-schilling-ca5-2017.