United States v. Nickerson
Opinion
wl
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintif£
Criminal Action No. 10-38 (CKK)
v.
FREDERICK JAMES NlCKERSON,
Defendant.
oRDER (May 6, 2010)
This case comes before the Court upon receipt of a [16] & [19] Report and Recommendation dated May 4, 2010, from Magistrate Judge Alan Kay. Due to scheduling conflicts with the Court’s calendar, this criminal matter was referred _ at the parties’ request and with Defendant’s written consent _ to Magistrate Judge Kay for a plea hearing. See Apr. 29, 2010 Order, Docket No. [15]. A plea hearing was subsequently held on May 4, 2010, at which time Defendant Frederick J ames Nickerson entered a guilty plea before Magistrate Judge Kay. See Docket Nos. [16] & [17] & [18].
Accordingly, upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Kay’s Report and Recommendation, it is this 6th day of May, 2010, hereby,
ORDERED that the [16] & [19] Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the plea of guilty to Count One of the lndictment (False Impersonation of Officer or Employee of the United States in violation of l 8 U.S.C. § 912), by l\/lr. Nickerson entered into before Magistrate Judge Kay is
ACCEPTED as being made knowingly and voluntarily.
6 . ¢FQ_»»§L@/M COLLEEN KOLLA -KOTELLY
United States District judge
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Nickerson (United States v. Nickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.