United States v. Nicholas Pyeatt
This text of 34 F. App'x 246 (United States v. Nicholas Pyeatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nicholas Pyeatt appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri, revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 30 months imprisonment. For reversal, Pyeatt argues that the sentence was an upward departure from the Chapter 7 Guidelines and that the district court might have imposed a shorter sentence if the court had realized that Pyeatt might fail to complete a Bureau of Prisons boot-camp program. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
As Pyeatt’s counsel acknowledges, the court was not bound to impose a sentence within Chapter 7’s recommended range. See United States v. Carr, 66 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir.1995) (per curiam). Further, the district court specifically noted that Pyeatt would have to serve the full 30-month sentence in prison if he failed to complete boot camp.
Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 F. App'x 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nicholas-pyeatt-ca8-2002.