United States v. Nicholas Lindsey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Nicholas Lindsey. Read the opinion of the Court — 850 F.3d 1009
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2017·No. 14-10004·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10004 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:11-cr-00217- LDG-CWH-1 NICHOLAS LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

Filed February 3, 2017

Before: Susan P. Graber,* Ronald M. Gould, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Defendant-Appellant’s petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The prior opinion and memorandum disposition filed June 28, 2016, are withdrawn. A substitute opinion and substitute memorandum disposition shall be filed in due course.

* After oral argument in this case, and our former opinion and memorandum disposition filed June 28, 2016, and after the petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc was filed on August 19, 2016, Judge Graber on January 26, 2017, replaced Judge Noonan on this panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nicholas Lindsey, (9th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Nicholas Lindsey (United States v. Nicholas Lindsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.