United States v. Nicholas Busich
This text of United States v. Nicholas Busich (United States v. Nicholas Busich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
___________
No. 95-3875 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Nicholas Louis Busich, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: March 28, 1996
Filed: April 4, 1996 ___________
Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Nicholas Louis Busich challenges his convictions upon his guilty pleas to distributing cocaine base and methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal, Busich argues that a prior uncontested civil administrative forfeiture of a 1984 Chevrolet pickup truck barred his prosecution and conviction on double jeopardy grounds. This argument is foreclosed, however, by our recent opinion in United States v. Sykes, 73 F.3d 772, 773-74 (8th Cir. 1996).
The judgment is affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Nicholas Busich, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nicholas-busich-ca8-1996.