United States v. Nicholas Busich

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 4, 1996·No. 95-3875·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 95-3875

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas.

Nicholas Louis Busich, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

Submitted: March 28, 1996

Filed: April 4, 1996

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Louis Busich challenges his convictions upon his guilty pleas to distributing cocaine base and methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal, Busich argues that a prior uncontested civil administrative forfeiture of a 1984 Chevrolet pickup truck barred his prosecution and conviction on double jeopardy grounds. This argument is foreclosed, however, by our recent opinion in United States v. Sykes, 73 F.3d 772, 773-74 (8th Cir. 1996).

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nicholas Busich, (8th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Nicholas Busich (United States v. Nicholas Busich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lamond Sykes, Also Known as Q
73 F.3d 772 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)