United States v. Nicholas Busich

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 1996
Docket95-3875
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Nicholas Busich (United States v. Nicholas Busich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nicholas Busich, (8th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

___________

No. 95-3875 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Nicholas Louis Busich, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: March 28, 1996

Filed: April 4, 1996 ___________

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Louis Busich challenges his convictions upon his guilty pleas to distributing cocaine base and methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal, Busich argues that a prior uncontested civil administrative forfeiture of a 1984 Chevrolet pickup truck barred his prosecution and conviction on double jeopardy grounds. This argument is foreclosed, however, by our recent opinion in United States v. Sykes, 73 F.3d 772, 773-74 (8th Cir. 1996).

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lamond Sykes, Also Known as Q
73 F.3d 772 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Nicholas Busich, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nicholas-busich-ca8-1996.