United States v. Niblock
This text of 469 F. App'x 272 (United States v. Niblock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
James R. Niblock appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment to which he pled guilty in 2003. The district court denied relief for the reasons stated in its prior orders deny[273]*273ing Niblock’s numerous prior challenges to his conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record in this case and have determined that the district court properly denied Niblock’s motion to dismiss the indictment. We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 F. App'x 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-niblock-ca4-2012.