United States v. Niblock

469 F. App'x 272
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7456
StatusPublished

This text of 469 F. App'x 272 (United States v. Niblock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Niblock, 469 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James R. Niblock appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment to which he pled guilty in 2003. The district court denied relief for the reasons stated in its prior orders deny[273]*273ing Niblock’s numerous prior challenges to his conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record in this case and have determined that the district court properly denied Niblock’s motion to dismiss the indictment. We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 F. App'x 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-niblock-ca4-2012.