United States v. Nguyen-Ii

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedApril 28, 2021
Docket201900085
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Nguyen-Ii (United States v. Nguyen-Ii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nguyen-Ii, (N.M. 2021).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON, BAKER, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

JustinKhang P. NGUYEN Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 201900085

Decided: 28 April 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Jeffrey V. Munoz

Sentence adjudged 19 December 2018 by a special court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence ap- proved by the convening authority: reduction to E-1, confinement for 11 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Christopher K. Riedel, JAGC, USN

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. United States v. Nguyen, NMCCA No. 201900085 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: This case is before us a second time. On 21 November 2019, we found er- ror in the convening authority’s approval of an adjudged $5,000 fine in light of the automatic forfeitures imposed under Article 58b, UCMJ, for the ap- proved term of confinement, which we found violated Rule for Courts-Martial 1107(d)(5). After we set aside the convening authority’s action and remanded the case for new post-trial processing, the convening authority took action disapproving the fine, which corrected the matter. After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, and in light of the new convening authority’s action, we have deter- mined that the findings and sentence are now correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Nguyen-Ii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nguyen-ii-nmcca-2021.