United States v. Nguyen

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Nguyen. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 F.3d 796
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2000·No. 99-20464·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 99-20464 -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20464 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HUEY ANDY NGUYEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-226-1 -------------------- April 14, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Huey Andy Nguyen appeals his conviction for bank robbery.

Nguyen argues that the district court abused its discretion when

it allowed evidence of a prior criminal act provided by two

witnesses. Nguyen argues that the evidence was extrinsic and

that the evidence had little probative value and was highly

prejudicial.

The evidence was intrinsic because the evidence of a prior

criminal act was inextricably intertwined with Trung Nguyen’s

decision to help Nguyen rob the bank. See United States v.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-20464 -2-

Navarro, 169 F.3d 228, 232-33 (5th Cir. 1999). Thus, no Rule

404(b) determinations were not required, and no limiting

instruction was required. See id. at 233.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nguyen, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Nguyen (United States v. Nguyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related