United States v. Newton

73 M.J. 423, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 636

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Newton. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 M.J. 69 →

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided June 27, 2014·No. No. 14-0415/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20110499. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT (SORNA), 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2250(a) (2006), APPLIED TO APPELLANT AS A RESULT OF EITHER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S 2007 INTERIM RULE OR HIS 2008 GUIDELINES. SEE, E.G., UNITED STATES v. LOTT, 750 F.3d 214 (2d Cir. 2014); UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS, 710 F.3d 498 (3d Cir. 2013.)

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20110499. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT (SORNA), 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2250(a) (2006), APPLIED TO APPELLANT AS A RESULT OF EITHER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S 2007 INTERIM RULE OR HIS 2008 GUIDELINES. SEE, E.G., UNITED STATES v. LOTT, 750 F.3d 214 (2d Cir. 2014); UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS, 710 F.3d 498 (3d Cir. 2013.)

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

United States v. Newton, 73 M.J. 423, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 636 (Ark. 2014).

Pincite

73 M.J. 423 (United States v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. Billy Reynolds

710 F.3d 498 (Third Circuit, 2013)

United States v. Lott

750 F.3d 214 (Second Circuit, 2014)

Opinion

Related