United States v. Newby Franklin Love

867 F.2d 209
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 1989
Docket88-7647
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 867 F.2d 209 (United States v. Newby Franklin Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Newby Franklin Love, 867 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Newby Franklin Love has appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate sentence 1 by the District Court of South Carolina. Although the two cases were not consolidated for purposes of appeal, Love’s oral argument was heard in this court at the same time as that of Robert Edward Lee, an original co-defendant, and the assignments of error pressed by Love and Lee are substantially identical.

After taking into consideration the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent authorities, we affirm the denial of Love’s motion for the reasons fully articulated in the opinion filed in the companion case of United States v. Lee, 867 F.2d 206 (4th Cir.1989).

AFFIRMED.

1

. 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Newby Franklin Love
991 F.2d 792 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 F.2d 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-newby-franklin-love-ca4-1989.