United States v. New
294 F. 90, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1923·No. No. 2155·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The appeal challenges the finding of fact of the District Court that the steamship Hawarden was solely at fault for collision with the schooner Richmond. The finding has abundant support in the testimony. Indeed, we think the reasoning in the opinion of the District Court shows that the decree is supported by the weight of the evidence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. New, 294 F. 90, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466 (4th Cir. 1923).
294 F. 90 (United States v. New) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Osaka Shosen Kaisha, Ltd. v. The Motor Vessel Elene
190 F. Supp. 201 (D. Maryland, 1961)
United States v. Holland
151 F. Supp. 772 (D. Maryland, 1957)
Lea River Lines, Inc. v. The Virginia
85 F. Supp. 89 (W.D. Kentucky, 1949)