United States v. New
294 F. 90, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1923
DocketNo. 2155
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 294 F. 90 (United States v. New) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. New, 294 F. 90, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466 (4th Cir. 1923).
Opinion
The appeal challenges the finding of fact of the District Court that the steamship Hawarden was solely at fault for collision with the schooner Richmond. The finding has abundant support in the testimony. Indeed, we think the reasoning in the opinion of the District Court shows that the decree is supported by the weight of the evidence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Osaka Shosen Kaisha, Ltd. v. The Motor Vessel Elene
190 F. Supp. 201 (D. Maryland, 1961)
United States v. Holland
151 F. Supp. 772 (D. Maryland, 1957)
Lea River Lines, Inc. v. The Virginia
85 F. Supp. 89 (W.D. Kentucky, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
294 F. 90, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-new-ca4-1923.