United States v. Neville Bruce Thompson

728 F.2d 654, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25043
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Neville Bruce Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 716 F.2d 248
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 1984·No. 82-5201·Published

Opinion

728 F.2d 654

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Neville Bruce THOMPSON, Appellant.

No. 82-5201.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 7, 1984.
Decided Feb. 28, 1984.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilson; Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Jack B. Crawley, Jr., Rocky Mount, N.C. (Spruill, Lane, McCotter & Jolly, Rocky Mount, N.C., on brief), for appellant.

Margaret I. Miller, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Samuel T. Currin, U.S. Atty., Raleigh, N.C., on brief), for appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge, sitting in banc.

PER CURIAM:

On rehearing in banc, the panel opinions in United States v. Thompson, 716 F.2d 248 (4 Cir.1983) are vacated, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Neville Bruce Thompson, 728 F.2d 654, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25043 (4th Cir. 1984).

728 F.2d 654 (United States v. Neville Bruce Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Neville Bruce Thompson
716 F.2d 248 (Fourth Circuit, 1983)