United States v. Nesby

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 11, 2011
DocketCriminal No. 2001-0422
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Nesby (United States v. Nesby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nesby, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

Criminal No. 0l-00422-0l (RCL/AK)

AKIL NESBY, Defendant.

FILED

d FEB 1 s 2011

Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Cotumbia

) ) ) v. ) ) ) )

AMENDED CONSENT TO MODIFY SUPERVISED RELEASE Following the Defendant’s conviction of Assault on a Police Officer in the Superior

Court of the District of Columbia, he was sentenced to performing 90 hours of community service. Tlie charges culminating in the aforementioned conviction and sentence resulted in the Probation Office of this Court charging the Defendant with violating the conditions of his supervised release in the above-captioned case. The Probation Officer recommended that the appropriate sanction for the violation should be a modification of the Defendant’s special conditions of Supervised Release to include 60 days in a halfway house. Both the United States and the Defendant agree with the recommendation of the United States Probation Off`ice. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED THAT the special conditions of Defendant’s Supervised

Release be modified to include a 60 day placement in the Hope Village facility.

/‘ ¢- ’ DATED: E¢Lm,¢.:.' §§ , 2011 W w

ALAN’KAY UNITED STATES AGI RATE JUDGE

Failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this

report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the District Court adopting such findings

and recommendations. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

The Magistrate Judge having recommended that the conditions of Defendant’s supervised '

release be modified and there being no objection thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted.

DATED: """°"‘~ /( ,2011

UNITED WI`A'I`ES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Nesby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nesby-dcd-2011.