United States v. Nerad
70 M.J. 221, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Nerad. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 M.J. 138 →
Opinion
CCA 36994. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Nerad, 70 M.J. 221, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 525 (Ark. 2011).
70 M.J. 221 (United States v. Nerad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.