United States v. Nelson Hernandez

329 F. App'x 33
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 2009
Docket08-2139
StatusUnpublished

This text of 329 F. App'x 33 (United States v. Nelson Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nelson Hernandez, 329 F. App'x 33 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nelson Hernandez appeals the district court’s 1 order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4246, and we affirm.

Section 4246 provides for the indefinite hospitalization of a person who has been committed to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) (concerning mental incompetence to stand trial) and who is found — after a hearing, by clear and convincing evidence-to be suffering from a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246. In this case, the district court found that commit *34 ment was appropriate because state placement was unavailable and the mental health professionals who examined Hernandez unanimously believed that his paranoid beliefs, delusion ideation, and history of threatening statements and aggressive and antisocial behavior, would create a risk of dangerousness within the meaning of section 4246 if Hernandez were unconditionally released. We hold that this finding is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676-77 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review). We note that Hernandez’s custodians are under an ongoing obligation to prepare annual reports concerning his mental condition and the need for his continued hospitalization, see 18 U.S.C. § 4247(e)(1)(B), and to exert reasonable efforts to place him in a suitable state facility, see 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dorian Williams
299 F.3d 673 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 F. App'x 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nelson-hernandez-ca8-2009.