United States v. Nelson
20 C.M.A. 184, 20 USCMA 184, 43 C.M.R. 24, 1970 CMA LEXIS 674, 1970 WL 7419
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
The military judge in this case granted the appellant’s written request to be tried by military judge alone without further inquiry whether the request was “understandingly made.” (Paragraph 53d(2)(6), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition).) The omission is nonprejudicial, however. United States v Jenkins, 20 USCMA 112, 42 CMR 304 (1970), and United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970).
Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Nelson, 20 C.M.A. 184, 20 USCMA 184, 43 C.M.R. 24, 1970 CMA LEXIS 674, 1970 WL 7419 (cma 1970).
20 C.M.A. 184 (United States v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Jenkins
20 C.M.A. 112 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Turner
20 C.M.A. 167 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)