United States v. Nelson Clyde Tilley

887 F.2d 1088, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15983, 1989 WL 123152
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 19, 1989·No. 89-3196·Unpublished

Opinion

887 F.2d 1088

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nelson Clyde TILLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-3196.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1989.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.*

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

The Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sotting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nelson Clyde Tilley, 887 F.2d 1088, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15983, 1989 WL 123152 (6th Cir. 1989).

887 F.2d 1088 (United States v. Nelson Clyde Tilley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woolum (William D.) v. Scroggy (Gene)
887 F.2d 1088 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)