United States v. Nelson

262 F. App'x 589
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 2008
Docket07-40545
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 F. App'x 589 (United States v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nelson, 262 F. App'x 589 (5th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Antoine Nelson appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea for assaulting an employee of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) & (b). Nelson’s sole argument on appeal is that the district court erred in applying U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2 based on its finding that the boiling water thrown by Nelson onto a corrections officer was a “dangerous weapon” under the Guidelines. Nelson argues that under § 2A2.2 a “dangerous weapon” refers only *590 to “instruments” and not to substances, such as water. Nelson does not refute, however, the district court’s finding that the assault caused serious bodily injuries.

Nelson has failed to demonstrate any error in the district court’s finding that the hot water, in the manner used and in light of the injuries sustained, was a “dangerous weapon” under § 2A2.2. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Marco Olarte-Rojas
820 F.3d 798 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nelson-ca5-2008.