United States v. Nelson
This text of 262 F. App'x 589 (United States v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Antoine Nelson appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea for assaulting an employee of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) & (b). Nelson’s sole argument on appeal is that the district court erred in applying U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2 based on its finding that the boiling water thrown by Nelson onto a corrections officer was a “dangerous weapon” under the Guidelines. Nelson argues that under § 2A2.2 a “dangerous weapon” refers only *590 to “instruments” and not to substances, such as water. Nelson does not refute, however, the district court’s finding that the assault caused serious bodily injuries.
Nelson has failed to demonstrate any error in the district court’s finding that the hot water, in the manner used and in light of the injuries sustained, was a “dangerous weapon” under § 2A2.2. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nelson-ca5-2008.