United States v. Negron

372 F. App'x 788
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2010·No. No. 09-50380·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Miguel Angel Negron appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Negron contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider and discuss certain facts and factors and also contends that the sentence is substan[789] tively unreasonable. The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err, and the sentence is not substantively unreasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 49-51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 356-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Negron, 372 F. App'x 788 (9th Cir. 2010).

372 F. App'x 788 (United States v. Negron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rita v. United States
551 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Carty
520 F.3d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)