United States v. Negrete

671 F. App'x 769
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 2016
DocketNo. 16-11018 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 671 F. App'x 769 (United States v. Negrete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Negrete, 671 F. App'x 769 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Scott Sakin, appointed counsel for Alex Negrete in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L,Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is [770]*770GRANTED, and Negrete’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-negrete-ca11-2016.