United States v. Neavill

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Neavill

877 F.2d 1394, 1989 WL 67278

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 21, 1989·No. No. 87-2692-EM·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Appellee’s petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc has been considered by the Court and is hereby granted. The Court’s opinion of March 1, 1989, 868 F.2d 1000 (1989), is vacated. The Clerk of this Court is directed to set the case for en banc argument during the September 1989 session of court. The parties may file supplemental pleadings limited to not more than fifteen (15) pages and any arguments contained therein shall not duplicate any of the previously advanced arguments.

The motion to appoint new counsel and the motion for release pending appeal have also been considered by the Court and both motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Appellee’s petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc has been considered by the Court and is hereby granted. The Court’s opinion of March 1, 1989, 868 F.2d 1000 (1989), is vacated. The Clerk of this Court is directed to set the case for en banc argument during the September 1989 session of court. The parties may file supplemental pleadings limited to not more than fifteen (15) pages and any arguments contained therein shall not duplicate any of the previously advanced arguments.

The motion to appoint new counsel and the motion for release pending appeal have also been considered by the Court and both motions are denied.

United States v. Neavill, 877 F.2d 1394, 1989 WL 67278 (8th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

877 F.2d 1394 (United States v. Neavill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related