United States v. Neavill
This text of 877 F.2d 1394 (United States v. Neavill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Appellee’s petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc has been considered by the Court and is hereby granted. The Court’s opinion of March 1, 1989, 868 F.2d 1000 (1989), is vacated. The Clerk of this Court is directed to set the case for en banc argument during the September 1989 session of court. The parties may file supplemental pleadings limited to not more than fifteen (15) pages and any arguments contained therein shall not duplicate any of the previously advanced arguments.
The motion to appoint new counsel and the motion for release pending appeal have also been considered by the Court and both motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
877 F.2d 1394, 1989 WL 67278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-neavill-ca8-1989.