United States v. Navarro-Gonzalez

139 F. App'x 895
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 2005
DocketNo. 03-30442
StatusPublished

This text of 139 F. App'x 895 (United States v. Navarro-Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Navarro-Gonzalez, 139 F. App'x 895 (9th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

We remand the sentence imposed in this case to the district court, without vacating the sentence, to follow the procedure established in the en banc decision of United States v. Ameline,1 and to consider whether the sentence would have been materially different in light of United States v. Booker.2

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 F. App'x 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-navarro-gonzalez-ca9-2005.