United States v. Navarro-Gonzalez

139 F. App'x 895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Navarro-Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 F. App'x 123
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2005·No. No. 03-30442·Published

Opinion

ORDER

We remand the sentence imposed in this case to the district court, without vacating the sentence, to follow the procedure established in the en banc decision of United States v. Ameline,1 and to consider whether the sentence would have been materially different in light of United States v. Booker.2

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Navarro-Gonzalez, 139 F. App'x 895 (9th Cir. 2005).

139 F. App'x 895 (United States v. Navarro-Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)