United States v. Navarrete

333 F. App'x 488
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 16, 2009·No. Nos. 09-10182, 09-10188·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, appointed counsel for Geovanni Navarrete in Case No. 09-10182, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit with respect to Case No. 09-10182, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Geovanni Navar-rete’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

John L. Badalamenti, appointed counsel for Cesar Navarrete in Case No. 09-10188, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit with respect to Case No. 09-10188, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cesar Navarrete’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Navarrete, 333 F. App'x 488 (11th Cir. 2009).

333 F. App'x 488 (United States v. Navarrete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)