United States v. Navaro

774 F.2d 565
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 2, 1985·No. No. 235, Docket 85-1182·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue raised on appeal is a claim that the district judge erred when he did not make findings of fact with regard to alleged inaccuracies in the presentence report. However, the district judge explicitly stated that he “did not consider [the] alleged inaccuracies” in his determination of the sentence to be imposed. He thus fully complied with the requirements of Rule 32(c)(3)(D)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and was not otherwise required to make findings with regard to the alleged inaccuracies. United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1985).

774 F.2d 565 (United States v. Navaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert Dunston v. United States
878 F.2d 648 (Second Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Gerald John Bermingham
855 F.2d 925 (Second Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Romano
825 F.2d 725 (Second Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Potamitis
666 F. Supp. 43 (S.D. New York, 1987)
United States v. Harold T. Bradley
812 F.2d 774 (Second Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Anthony E. Ursillo
786 F.2d 66 (Second Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Joseph A. Navaro
774 F.2d 565 (Second Circuit, 1985)