United States v. Navaro
This text of 774 F.2d 565 (United States v. Navaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole issue raised on appeal is a claim that the district judge erred when he did not make findings of fact with regard to alleged inaccuracies in the presentence report. However, the district judge explicitly stated that he “did not consider [the] alleged inaccuracies” in his determination of the sentence to be imposed. He thus fully complied with the requirements of Rule 32(c)(3)(D)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and was not otherwise required to make findings with regard to the alleged inaccuracies. United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
774 F.2d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-navaro-ca2-1985.