United States v. Natividad
This text of 78 F. App'x 633 (United States v. Natividad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Christopher Isaac Natividad appeals his 262-month sentence following his guilty plea to distribution of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a private elementary school and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 860(a) and 841(a)(1).
Natividad argues that the district court failed to make adequate findings in rejecting his claim of sentencing entrapment or manipulation by undercover officers. The record, however, is clear that the court exercised its discretion not to make a downward departure. Such a discretionary decision is unreviewable. See United States v. Romero, 293 F.3d 1120, 1126 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1144, 123 S.Ct. 948, 154 L.Ed.2d 844 (2003).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 F. App'x 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-natividad-ca9-2003.