United States v. Nathan Van Buren

5 F.4th 1327
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Nathan Van Buren. Read the opinion of the Court — 940 F.3d 1192
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 4, 2021·No. 18-12024·Published

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 18-12024 Date Filed: 08/04/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-12024

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00243-ODE-JFK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NATHAN VAN BUREN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

(August 4, 2021)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and BOGGS,∗ Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

∗ Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

USCA11 Case: 18-12024 Date Filed: 08/04/2021 Page: 2 of 2

When this case came to us initially, our circuit precedent required that we affirm Van Buren’s conviction for computer fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1030 because he misused a database for an inappropriate nonbusiness reason, even though he was otherwise authorized to use and could lawfully access the database. See United States v. Van Buren, 940 F.3d 1192, 1207–08 (11th Cir. 2019) (citing United States v. Rodriguez, 628 F.3d 1258, 1263 (11th Cir. 2010)). On June 3, 2021, the United States Supreme Court reversed our decision, holding that 18 U.S.C. § 1030 applies when a person “accesses a computer with authorization but then obtains information located in particular areas of that computer—such as files, folders, or databases—that are off limits to him.” Van Buren v. United States, 593 U.S. __, 141 S. Ct. 1648, 1652, 1662 (2021). “It does not cover those who, like Van Buren, have improper motives for obtaining information that is otherwise available to them.” Id. at 1652. For the reasons stated in the Supreme Court’s decision, we vacate Van Buren’s conviction for computer fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1030 and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nathan Van Buren, 5 F.4th 1327 (11th Cir. 2021).

5 F.4th 1327 (United States v. Nathan Van Buren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rodriguez
628 F.3d 1258 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)