United States v. Nathan J. Jarvis
This text of 18 F. App'x 457 (United States v. Nathan J. Jarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nathan J. Jarvis pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the district court 1 sentenced him to 108 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Jarvis’s counsel has filed a brief — arguing that the court should have granted Jarvis a downward departure— and has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jarvis has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
As counsel acknowledges, because the district court was aware of its authority to grant a downward departure, its discretionary decision not to depart is unreviewable. See United States v. Lim, 235 F.3d 382, 385 (8th Cir.2000). After reviewing the record independently pursuant to Pen-son v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable William G. Cambridge, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, now retired.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. App'x 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nathan-j-jarvis-ca8-2001.