United States v. Nathan Gellman, D/B/A Gellman Brothers

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Nathan Gellman, D/B/A Gellman Brothers

229 F.2d 742

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 18, 1955·No. 15443·Published

Opinion

229 F.2d 742

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Nathan GELLMAN et al., d/b/a Gellman Brothers.

No. 15443.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

November 18, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

George E. MacKinnon, U. S. Atty., Alex Dim, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Paul, Minn., H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack, Atty., Department of Justice, for appellant.

Maurice Weinstein, Milwaukee, Wis., and Charles H. Halpern, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed without costs to either party in this Court, on stipulation of parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

229 F.2d 742

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Nathan GELLMAN et al., d/b/a Gellman Brothers.

No. 15443.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

November 18, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

George E. MacKinnon, U. S. Atty., Alex Dim, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Paul, Minn., H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack, Atty., Department of Justice, for appellant.

Maurice Weinstein, Milwaukee, Wis., and Charles H. Halpern, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed without costs to either party in this Court, on stipulation of parties.

United States v. Nathan Gellman, D/B/A Gellman Brothers, 229 F.2d 742 (8th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

229 F.2d 742 (United States v. Nathan Gellman, D/B/A Gellman Brothers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.