United States v. Nash
This text of 328 F. App'x 386 (United States v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Phillip Nash seeks review of the revocation of his pre-trial release, alleging that deviations from the proper protocol in the testing of his urine specimen rendered unreliable the conclusion that the specimen showed cocaine use. Nash was subsequently sentenced and is serving a 160-month prison term.
We affirm the district court. Nash has failed to show that the record does not support the district court’s determination that the alleged deviations from the protocol for taking and testing Nash’s urine specimen did not undermine the findings that the specimen came from Nash and tested positive for cocaine use. See United States v. Gebro, 948 F.2d 1118, 1121 (9th Cir.1991).
This district court’s revocation of pretrial release is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nash-ca9-2009.