United States v. Naranjo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 20, 2005·No. 03-4759·Published

Opinion

Opinions of the United

2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

10-20-2005

USA v. Naranjo Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 03-4759

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

Recommended Citation "USA v. Naranjo" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 291. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/291

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No.: 03-4759

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ADOLFO NARANJO,

Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Crim. No. 03-CR-00253-1)

District Judge: Hon. James T. Giles

BEFORE: ALITO, McKEE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on September 23, 2005, be amended as follows:

On page 8, at footnote 5, after “Agent Rodgers explained that” and before “Naranjo” insert “he did not actually see”.

Additionally, in that same sentence, replace “signed” with “sign”.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Theordore A. McKee

Circuit Judge

Dated: October 20, 2005

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Naranjo, (3d Cir. 2005).

United States v. Naranjo (United States v. Naranjo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.