United States v. Naranjo
Opinion
Opinions of the United
2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
10-20-2005
USA v. Naranjo Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 03-4759
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005
Recommended Citation "USA v. Naranjo" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 291. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/291
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No.: 03-4759
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ADOLFO NARANJO,
Appellant
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Crim. No. 03-CR-00253-1)
District Judge: Hon. James T. Giles
BEFORE: ALITO, McKEE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on September 23, 2005, be amended as follows:
On page 8, at footnote 5, after “Agent Rodgers explained that” and before “Naranjo” insert “he did not actually see”.
Additionally, in that same sentence, replace “signed” with “sign”.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Theordore A. McKee
Circuit Judge
Dated: October 20, 2005
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Naranjo (United States v. Naranjo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.