United States v. Naranjo

10 F.3d 805, 1993 WL 472824
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 1993
Docket93-1469
StatusUnpublished

This text of 10 F.3d 805 (United States v. Naranjo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Naranjo, 10 F.3d 805, 1993 WL 472824 (1st Cir. 1993).

Opinion

10 F.3d 805

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Luis Eduardo NARANJO, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 93-1469.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

November 18, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Luis Eduardo Naranjo on brief pro se.

Edwin J. Gale, United States Attorney, and Zechariah Chaffee, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

D.R.I.

AFFIRMED

Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

On April 12, 1991, appellant Luis Eduardo Naranjo was sentenced to 63 months in prison for drug offenses. At sentencing, Naranjo received a two-level reduction in base offense level for acceptance of responsibility. Effective November 1, 1992, the United States Sentencing Commission amended sentencing guideline Sec. 3E1.1 to permit an additional one-level reduction in base offense level for persons eligible for the two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. Naranjo sought to reduce his sentence pursuant to the amended guideline, claiming that the amendment should be applied retroactively. The district court denied his request. Because we have decided that the amendment in question is not retroactive, see DeSouza v. United States, 995 F.2d 323, 324 (1st Cir. 1993) (per curiam), we affirm the district court's denial of Naranjo's request for a sentence reduction under amended Sec. 3E1.1.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barbara Bushway Desouza v. United States
995 F.2d 323 (First Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 F.3d 805, 1993 WL 472824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-naranjo-ca1-1993.