United States v. Najimias-Nacach
This text of 472 F. App'x 665 (United States v. Najimias-Nacach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
David Najimias-Nacach appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for attempted entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Najimias-Nacach’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Najimias-Nacach has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 F. App'x 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-najimias-nacach-ca9-2012.